UPSC Prelims PYQ › Modern History › Advent of Europeans & Company Rule
Advent of Europeans & Company Rule — UPSC Prelims Modern History previous year questions
20 free solved previous year questions on Advent of Europeans & Company Rule, papers from 1995 to 2025, drawn from UPSC CSE Prelims, State PCS, UPSC CDS, covering statement-based, direct, match and assertion questions. Every answer key has been checked again against published sources and solved independently, and each explanation is written fresh.
Read all 20 questions with answers
- #1UPSC CSE 2025Consider the following fruits:I. PapayaII. PineappleIII. GuavaHow many of the above were introduced in India by the Portuguese in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries?
- AOnly one
- BOnly two
- CAll the three
- DNone
Answer: (C) All the threeExplanation
All three fruits were introduced by the Portuguese.
The Portuguese brought many crops from the Americas to India in the 16th and 17th centuries.
Papaya, pineapple and guava came this way. So did cashew, potato, chilli, tobacco and maize.
So the answer is all the three.
Remember: The Portuguese also brought the first printing press to India, at Goa in 1556.Source: Bipan Chandra, History of Modern India; NCERT Class XII Themes in Indian History II (Portuguese in India)
- #2UPSC CSE 2022With reference to Indian history, consider the following statements:1. The Dutch established their factories/warehouses on the east coast on lands granted to them by Gajapati rulers.2. Alfonso de Albuquerque captured Goa from the Bijapur Sultanate.3. The English East India Company established a factory at Madras on a plot of land leased from a representative of the Vijayanagara empire.Which of the statements given above are correct?
- A1 and 2 only
- B2 and 3 only
- C1 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3
Answer: (B) 2 and 3 onlyExplanation
Statement 1 is incorrect. The Gajapati dynasty ended around 1542. The Dutch company was formed only in 1602, so the Gajapatis could not have given it land.
Statement 2 is correct. Albuquerque took Goa from the Bijapur Sultanate in 1510.
Statement 3 is correct. The English got the Madras site in 1639 from Damarla Venkatapathy Nayak, a Vijayanagara chieftain.
So only statements 2 and 3 are correct.
Remember: Fort St George (1640) grew out of this Madras factory.Source: UPSC CSE Prelims 2022 question(key: 2 and 3 only)
- #3UPSC CSE 2021In the first quarter of seventeenth century, in which of the following was/were the factory/factories of the English East India Company located?1. Broach2. Chicacole3. TrichinopolySelect the correct answer using the code given below:
- A1 only
- B1 and 2
- C3 only
- D2 and 3
Answer: (A) 1 onlyExplanation
Statement 1 is correct. The English had a factory at Broach (Bharuch) in Gujarat in this period, along with Surat and Ahmedabad.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Chicacole (Srikakulam) did not have an English factory in this period.
Statement 3 is incorrect. Trichinopoly came into English dealings only in the 18th century, in the Carnatic wars.
Remember: early English factories were at Surat (1613), Masulipatnam and Broach.Source: Spear, A History of India Vol. 2; NCERT Class XII, Themes in Indian History Part II
- #4UPSC CSE 2020With reference to the history of India, consider the following pairs:1. Aurang - In-charge of treasury of the State2. Banian - Indian agent of the East India Company3. Mirasidar - Designated revenue payer to the StateWhich of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?
- A1 and 2 only
- B2 and 3 only
- C3 only
- D1, 2 and 3
Answer: (B) 2 and 3 onlyExplanation
Pair 1 is incorrect. An aurang was a place of manufacture or a warehouse where goods were made, not a treasury office.
Pair 2 is correct. A banian was an Indian agent or broker who worked for the East India Company.
Pair 3 is correct. A mirasidar was a hereditary holder of village land in south India who paid the land revenue to the state.
So the correct answer is 2 and 3 only.Source: Bipan Chandra, History of Modern India; NCERT Class XII, Themes in Indian History Part III
- #5UPSC CSE 2020Which of the following statements correctly explains the impact of Industrial Revolution on India during the first half of the nineteenth century?
- AIndian handicrafts were ruined.
- BMachines were introduced in the Indian textile industry in large numbers.
- CRailway lines were laid in many parts of the country.
- DHeavy duties were imposed on the imports of British manufactures.
Answer: (A) Indian handicrafts were ruined.Explanation
Cheap machine-made British goods flooded India after 1813, and Indian cloth faced high duties in Britain. Because of this, the handloom and handicraft industries declined sharply.
Machines came to India's textile industry only from the 1850s. Railways started in 1853, which is after the first half of the century. British goods entered India at low duties, not heavy ones.Source: NCERT Class XII, Themes in Indian History Part III; Bipan Chandra, History of Modern India
- #6UPSC CSE 2018The staple commodities of export by the English East India Company from Bengal in the middle of the 18th century were:
- ARaw cotton, oil-seeds and opium
- BSugar, salt, zinc and lead
- CCopper, silver, gold, spices and tea
- DCotton, silk, saltpetre and opium
Answer: (D) Cotton, silk, saltpetre and opiumExplanation
In the mid-18th century the Company exported cotton and silk textiles from Bengal. It also exported saltpetre, used for gunpowder, and opium.
Raw cotton and oil-seeds became major exports only in the 19th century. Sugar, salt, zinc and lead were not staple exports. Tea exports began later, and gold and silver were imports to Bengal.Source: Bipan Chandra, History of Modern India
- #7UPSC CSE 2014The Partition of Bengal made by Lord Curzon in 1905 lasted until
- Athe First World War when Indian troops were needed by the British and the partition was ended.
- BKing George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911.
- CGandhiji launched his Civil Disobedience Movement.
- Dthe Partition of India in 1947 when East Bengal became East Pakistan.
Answer: (B) King George V abrogated Curzon's Act at the Royal Durbar in Delhi in 1911.Explanation
Curzon partitioned Bengal on 16 October 1905. Strong protests followed under the Swadeshi movement.
At the Delhi Durbar in December 1911, King George V announced the annulment of the partition. Bengal was reunited, and the capital moved from Calcutta to Delhi.
The First World War began in 1914, so it did not end the partition. Civil Disobedience began in 1930. The 1947 partition was a different event.
Remember: Partition annulled in 1911.Source: Bipan Chandra, India's Struggle for Independence
- #8UPSC CSE 2013The Ilbert Bill controversy was related to the
- Aimposition of certain restrictions to carry arms by the Indians.
- Bimposition of restrictions on newspapers and magazines published in Indian languages.
- Cremoval of disqualifications imposed on the Indian magistrates with regard to the trial of the Europeans.
- Dremoval of a duty on imported cotton cloth.
Answer: (C) removal of disqualifications imposed on the Indian magistrates with regard to the trial of the Europeans.Explanation
The Ilbert Bill was introduced in 1883 under Viceroy Lord Ripon. It was named after Courtenay Ilbert, the law member.
It allowed Indian judges and magistrates to try European British subjects. Until then, they could not.
Europeans in India protested strongly, and the bill was diluted.
The Arms Act of 1878 dealt with arms, and the Vernacular Press Act of 1878 with Indian language papers. The cotton duty was removed in 1879.
Remember: Ilbert Bill, 1883, Ripon.Source: UPSC CSE Prelims 2013 question(key: c)
- #9UPSC CSE 2011With reference to the period of colonial rule in India, 'Home Charges' formed an important part of the drain of wealth from India. Which of the following funds constituted 'Home Charges'?1. Funds used to support the India Office in London.2. Funds used to pay salaries and pensions of British personnel engaged in India.3. Funds used for waging wars outside India by the British.
- A1 only
- B1 and 2 only
- C2 and 3 only
- D1, 2 and 3
Answer: (B) 1 and 2 onlyExplanation
Home Charges were the payments India made in Britain. They were met from Indian revenues.
Statement 1 is correct. They included the cost of running the India Office in London.
Statement 2 is correct. They included salaries and pensions of British civil and military staff, and interest on debt and guaranteed railway capital.
Statement 3 is not part of the standard list of Home Charges. The costs of wars were charged under military expenditure.
Remember: Home Charges were paid in sterling in London.Source: Bipan Chandra, India's Struggle for Independence; Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #10UPSC CSE 2009During the time of which Mughal Emperor did the English East India Company establish its first factory in India?
- AAkbar
- BJahangir
- CShahjahan
- DAurangzeb
Answer: (B) JahangirExplanation
The English got a firman from Jahangir in 1613 to set up a factory at Surat.
The Company had reached Surat in 1608 through Captain Hawkins, and Sir Thomas Roe later secured trading rights at the Mughal court.
Akbar was the emperor when the Company was formed in 1600, but no factory was set up then.
Shahjahan and Aurangzeb ruled after the first factory was already working.
Remember: Surat 1613 was the first English factory; Masulipatnam (1611) was the first in South India.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India, Advent of Europeans
- #11UPSC CSE 2006In the year 1613, where was the English East India Company given permission to set up a factory (trading post)?
- ABangalore
- BMadras
- CMasulipattam
- DSurat
Answer: (D) SuratExplanation
Emperor Jahangir issued a farman in 1613 allowing the English to set up a factory at Surat.
Bangalore was never an early English trading post.
Madras was founded in 1639-40, when Francis Day got land from a local ruler.
Masulipatnam had an English factory from 1611, which is earlier than 1613 and was granted by the Golconda ruler, not the Mughal emperor.
Remember: Surat 1613 is the first permanent English factory in India.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India, Advent of Europeans
- #12UPSC CSE 2004Consider the following statements:1. In the Third Battle of Panipat, Ahmad Shah Abdali defeated Ibrahim Lodi.2. Tipu Sultan was killed in the Third Anglo-Mysore War.3. Mir Jafar entered into a conspiracy with the English for the defeat of Nawab Siraj-ud-daulah in the Battle of Plassey.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A1, 2 and 3
- B3 only
- C2 and 3
- DNone of the above
Answer: (B) 3 onlyExplanation
Statement 1 is incorrect. In the Third Battle of Panipat (1761) Abdali defeated the Marathas. Ibrahim Lodi died in the First Battle of Panipat (1526).
Statement 2 is incorrect. Tipu Sultan died in the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War in 1799.
Statement 3 is correct. Mir Jafar secretly agreed with Clive to betray Siraj-ud-Daula at Plassey in 1757.
Remember: The Third Anglo-Mysore War ended with the Treaty of Seringapatam (1792).Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #13UPSC CSE 1995Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched?
- ABattle of Buxar : Mir Jafar vs. Clive
- BBattle of Wandiwash : French vs. East India Company
- CBattle of Chilianwala : Dalhousie vs. Marathas
- DBattle of Khurda : Nizam vs. East India Company
Answer: (B) Battle of Wandiwash : French vs. East India CompanyExplanation
Pair a is incorrect. Mir Jafar and Clive were linked to Plassey (1757). Buxar (1764) was fought by Mir Qasim, Shuja-ud-Daula and Shah Alam II against the Company.
Pair b is correct. At Wandiwash (1760) the British under Eyre Coote defeated the French under Lally.
Pair c is incorrect. Chilianwala (1849) was fought against the Sikhs, not the Marathas.
Pair d is incorrect. Khurda (1804) was an Orissa uprising, not a Nizam war.
Remember: Wandiwash ended French hopes in India.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #14UPSC CDS 2014 (I) · key correctedConsider the following statements:1. Battle of Buxar provided the key to the English to establish their rule in India.2. The Treaty of Allahabad, concluded in 1765, enabled the British to establish their rule in Bengal.Which of the statement(s) given above is/are correct?
- AOnly 1
- BOnly 2
- CBoth 1 and 2
- DNeither 1 nor 2
Answer: (C) Both 1 and 2Explanation
Statement 1 is correct. Victory at Buxar in 1764 broke the combined Indian forces and confirmed British power.
Statement 2 is correct. By the 1765 treaty the Company got the Diwani of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
This gave it control of revenue and so of the province.
Remember: Plassey began Company power, but Buxar made it secure.Source: Bipan Chandra, History of Modern India
- #15UPPCS 2019Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:List-I: A. Treaty of Allahabad B. Treaty of Mangalore C. Treaty of Salbai D. Treaty of MadrasList-II: 1. 1782 2. 1784 3. 1769 4. 1765Code: A B C D
- A4 2 3 1
- B2 4 3 1
- C4 2 1 3
- D2 4 1 3
Answer: (C) 4 2 1 3Explanation
A. Treaty of Allahabad is of 1765, so A matches 4.
B. Treaty of Mangalore is of 1784, so B matches 2.
C. Treaty of Salbai is of 1782, so C matches 1.
D. Treaty of Madras is of 1769, so D matches 3.
The correct code is 4 2 1 3.
Remember: Salbai ended the First Anglo-Maratha War; Mangalore ended the Second Mysore War.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #16UPPCS 2016Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below the lists:List-I: A. First Carnatic War B. Third Carnatic War C. Second Carnatic War D. First Mysore WarList-II: 1. Ended by Treaty of Paris 2. Britishers Lost 3. Inconclusive 4. Ended by Treaty of Aix-la-ChapelleCode: A B C D
- A1 3 4 2
- B2 4 1 3
- C4 1 3 2
- D3 1 4 2
Answer: (C) 4 1 3 2Explanation
A. First Carnatic War was ended by the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748), so 4.
B. Third Carnatic War was ended by the Treaty of Paris (1763), so 1.
C. Second Carnatic War ended without a clear result and a treaty of 1755, so 3.
D. First Mysore War (1767-69) ended in the Treaty of Madras on Haider Ali's terms, so the British lost: 2.
The code is 4 1 3 2.
Remember: Treaty of Madras (1769) bound each side to help the other against attack.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #17UPPCS 2014 (Mains)Which of the following is correctly matched?
- AFirst Anglo-Mysore War : Hyder Ali was defeated
- BSecond Anglo-Mysore War : Hyder Ali defeated the British
- CThird Anglo-Mysore War : Tipu Sultan won the battle and did not cede his territory to the British
- DFourth Anglo-Mysore War : Tipu was defeated and was killed in the thick of battle
Answer: (D) Fourth Anglo-Mysore War : Tipu was defeated and was killed in the thick of battleExplanation
Pair a is incorrect. In the First Mysore War Haider Ali forced the British to the Treaty of Madras (1769).
Pair b is incorrect. The Second War (1780-84) ended without a clear winner, with the Treaty of Mangalore.
Pair c is incorrect. Tipu lost the Third War and gave up about half his territory by the Treaty of Seringapatam (1792).
Pair d is correct. Tipu died fighting at Seringapatam in May 1799.
Remember: Wellesley was Governor-General in the Fourth War.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #18UPPCS (Mains) 2014Which of the following is not correctly matched?
- ALord Cornwallis: Permanent Settlement
- BLord Wellesley: Subsidiary Alliance System
- CSir John Shore: Anglo-Nepal War
- DLord Hastings: Third Anglo-Maratha War
Answer: (C) Sir John Shore: Anglo-Nepal WarExplanation
Pair 1 is correct. Cornwallis introduced the Permanent Settlement in 1793.
Pair 2 is correct. Wellesley started the Subsidiary Alliance system.
Pair 3 is wrong. The Anglo-Nepal War of 1814-16 was fought under Lord Hastings, not Sir John Shore.
Pair 4 is correct. Hastings fought the Third Anglo-Maratha War in 1817-19.
Remember: the Treaty of Sugauli ended the Anglo-Nepal War.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #19UPPCS (Mains) 2013Which one of the following is correctly matched?
- ALord Ellenborough - Annexation of Awadh
- BLord Dalhousie - Annexation of Sindh
- CLord Wellesley - Fourth Anglo-Mysore War
- DSir John Shore - Third Anglo-Maratha War
Answer: (C) Lord Wellesley - Fourth Anglo-Mysore WarExplanation
Lord Wellesley fought the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War in 1799, in which Tipu Sultan died.
Awadh was annexed in 1856 under Dalhousie, not Ellenborough.
Sindh was annexed in 1843 under Ellenborough, not Dalhousie.
The Third Anglo-Maratha War was fought under Hastings, not Sir John Shore.
Remember: Seringapatam fell on 4 May 1799.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
- #20UPPCS 2006 (Mains)With reference to Pondicherry (now Puducherry), consider the following statements:1. The first European power to occupy Pondicherry was the Portuguese.2. The second European power to occupy Pondicherry was the French.3. The English never occupied Pondicherry.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- A1 only
- B2 and 3
- C3 only
- D1, 2 and 3
Answer: (A) 1 onlyExplanation
Statement 1 is correct as per the exam key. The Portuguese set up a settlement at Pondicherry around 1521.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The Dutch and the Danes also held Pondicherry before the French took it permanently in 1674.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The English captured Pondicherry several times, for example in 1761 and 1778.
So only statement 1 is correct.
Remember: Francois Martin founded French Pondicherry in 1674.Source: Spectrum, A Brief History of Modern India
Want all the Advent of Europeans & Company Rule questions?
143 more questions on this topic, plus mock tests, revision and progress tracking, are in the full practice set. One payment of ₹499.
Get full access – ₹499 Already have a code? Unlock here